Coffee for the masses.

U.S. State Senator: Earth Is 6,000 Years Old

I knew just by reading the headline that this was about a Republican.  OK, and the Keith Olbermann “Worst Persons in the World” headline tipped me off, too.

Seriously, at this point when you say some shit like this, the little (R) next to your name should be redundant.  Is it safe to say at this point that Republicans own the monopoly on powerful stupid?  Sylvia Allen is not even close to being in the minority within her own party; these are the intelligent design,  “gay is a sin”,  “global warming is a hoax” crew – and don’t even get me started on the people who vote for them.   My apologies to intelligent Southerners out there, but you’re surrounded by morons and they’re ruining our country.  Also, can we stop pretending that they’re the party of family values when the list of their sex scandals dwarf those of the Democrats?  If you think I’m painting conservatives with broad, unfair generalizations, well, they’ve got the monopoly on that, too.  Ever heard of the phrase “liberal elitists”?  As if all liberals were elitists.   Elite in what sense?  Financial?  Educational?  Olympic?

I swear, these rants are good for my brain.  This rant brought to you by Xyience Energy Drinks.*

*not literally.

35 responses

  1. Being ‘gay’ is not a sin, it is an abomination against the most Holy God:
    Homosexuality and bestiality

    Lev 18:22-29 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.

    August 19, 2009 at 12:00 pm

  2. God didnt ‘change’ just b/c LIBERALS showed up on the scene.

    August 19, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    • That’s odd, because I personally found God to be rather chill in the New Testament. You go ahead and believe that homosexuality is a sin. It’s not like science is ever correct about these things…

      Oh and while you’re at it, avoid shellfish. That’s an abomination, too…

      August 19, 2009 at 4:41 pm

  3. shellfish does not destroy ones soul. Homosexuality destroyed Rome and Greece, thats a fact.

    August 19, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    • Well if we’re going to go off what the Old Testament says:

      Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
      These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
      10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
      11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
      12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

      So yes, shellfish are an abomination unto the Lord and you will burn in hell for all eternity for partaking of the intoxicating decadence that is the shrimp fettuccine. Man I’m hungry. I could sure go for some eternal damnation grub right about now. Yum!

      August 20, 2009 at 12:29 am

  4. The New Testament also talks about homosexuality is an abomination. Peter the Apostle was told by the Holy Spirit that foods are KOSHER, but God never changed his mind about homosexuality.
    Thats the way it is. I have had many friends that are homosexuals, NONE are happy people, NOT 1.
    2 of my friends converted to Christianity, and got married and have kids, and believe that homosexuality is a choice, and have huge ministries, and many homosexuals have left the lifestyle because they were miserable.

    August 20, 2009 at 11:47 am

    • You’re Jewish, you don’t get to use the New Testament as an argument.

      In any case, you’re throwing Bible quotes at somebody who doesn’t believe in biblical accuracy. What I do believe is that only choices can be sins; since homosexuality is not a choice, it can not be a sin.

      August 21, 2009 at 12:24 am

  5. I have not met ONE person in my life onstage when I did theatre that believes homosexuality is ‘normal’
    Maybe you should TRY to read the Communist Goals that are in the Congressional Record, you have, in FACT BECOME EVERYTHING that has been indoctrinated by schools and etc.

    (Of course you wont read something that has been in the making since 1956, because ANYTHING that a ‘right-winger’ shows you is a lie (that is also IN th Communist Goals, to DEFAME us as LIARS)

    -28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

    30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

    ’26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.” [Condom & prostitution based Sex Ed. vs. abstinence which is ALWAYS 100% effective.] [Who needs biological warfare agents when deadly plagues like HIV-AIDs & incurable STD’s are so easy to proliferate, so easy to destroy physically, mentally & spiritually.] [ diversity = perversity.]

    August 21, 2009 at 11:55 am

    • You know, I did read the “Communist Goals” and then I did you one better – I looked up the author of said “Communist Goals”. Apparently, they were not even written by a Communist, but (surprise, surprise), a conservative.

      In citing that link as your source, you have done four very despicable things:

      1) You’ve insulted my intelligence by attempting to make me believe that Communists believe all of those things when in fact they’re the writings of a raving right-wing lunatic who made up some random shit about what HE imagines Communists believe. To put this into perspective, let’s say I decided to write a book (let’s call it “Naked Fascism”) and in it I wrote things like “Murder Homosexuals”, “bash undocumented workers”, “ignore science”, “deny women the right to vote”, “Hang Congressmen in effigy”, “serve corporations above the people”, “lie about your Black President’s religion and nationality”…things like that. Now, let’s say that in this alternate universe, I equate “Fascism” with “the Republican Party” and that I’m the Speaker of the House and I give this speech in front of the entire congressional body. Although the comparison is more accurate (fascism by definition, is corporate control of the government), I wouldn’t try something like that. I’d only try it if the majority of Republicans were anything like you.

      2) You’ve attempted to lump progressives with Communists in the first place. Again, bullshit. Progressives believe in freedom of speech, assembly, religion, and basically every other type of social freedom. Communists do not. No progressive I know or have ever heard of advocates the state ownership of ALL private enterprise and private property. We believe in private property, just not the privatization of public resources and essential public services. Communists, on the other hand, believe you don’t even own the computer you’re typing on. We are not Communists; we just look like Communists because you’re so far off to the right that you make Bill O’Reilly look like a liberal. In short, we look like Commies because we’re not fascists like you.

      3) You’ve attempted to equate support for homosexuals with Communism. Again, despicable and full of shit. The two have about as much in common as straight people and fascism. Am I a fascist simply because I’m straight? Then what do you make of all those Republicans getting caught having affairs with men (and in some cases, boys)? They must not be true fasci- I mean, Republicans!

      4) You’ve become an apologist for a political tactic that was considered indecent and morally bankrupt even in Joe McCarthy’s time (a tactic for which he was publicly humiliated and accused of having no decency before he was run out of office – but only after having ruined the lives and careers of hundreds of innocent people). Your “source” was simply a remnant of a well documented, McCarthy-style witch hunt against supposed Communists in our government that was proven ineffective, fear-driven, and done for personal political gain. In short, your best argument against homosexuality was a piece of morally rotten, thoroughly discredited, fear-mongering propaganda. Yeah. Nice try.

      August 21, 2009 at 9:50 pm

  6. Oh, also, I cant read the New Testament for myself?? I thought Jesus was a JEW?

    August 21, 2009 at 2:28 pm

  7. I also saw your nutty Youtube exalting Frank.
    Remember something, Frank is EMPLOYED BY US, the people, not the vc versa.
    The way he conducted himself was DISGUSTING.
    OR, do you condone EMPLOYEES acting like this with EMPLOYERS?

    August 21, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    • Actually, I don’t take shit from any employer who acts like a jackass. But hey, that’s just me.

      August 21, 2009 at 9:05 pm

  8. No, they were NOT written by a conservative, thats #1.
    They were from RUSSIA, hardly conservative. #2.
    #3. AFTER reading this, you are no longer innocent.

    August 21, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    • From your link:

      “At Mrs. Nordman’s request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following “Current Communist Goals,” which she identifies as an excerpt from “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen”

      Cleon Skousen:

      Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author, political commentator, academic, and civil servant. He was a prominent figure among American conservatives and authored several books on conservative thought.

      Skousen was born to a Mormon family in Raymond, Alberta, Canada, and moved with his family to both Mexico and then back to California as a youth. At the age of 17 he accepted a religious assignment in Great Britain as a missionary for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

      So not only are you wrong about his politics, you don’t even get his place of birth correct. You’re not giving me much confidence in your ability to come correct with FACTS, which sort of reinforces my belief that conservatives have to LIE in order for people to accept their bullshit. The moment you have to lie to convince people of your ideas is the moment you’ve shown that your philosophy can not stand on its own merits.

      August 21, 2009 at 10:33 pm

  9. Also, the ‘insulting intelligence’ is hardly probable to a person that is INDEPENDENT and NOT GOP.

    More: One CANNOT be ‘fascistic’ when not in power. Independents and conservatives are NOT IN POWER, in order to be a ‘fascist’ one must have a LEADER with a PARTY.

    Democrats are fascists now, IMPOSING their ways upon people worse than that of King George.

    Norman M Thomas( 1884-1968); 6 time Presidential candidate on the Socialist Party ticket.
    Quote: “The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened.”

    Quote: “I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.”

    August 21, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    • I didn’t even need to look this up to know you were full of shit. The Democratic party as it is now known was the conservative party back in his time; the Republicans were the liberals. The shift didn’t occur until the 60s. Thomas died in 1968, so he couldn’t have possibly referred to the Democrats of his time as “socialists”. Again…another lie.

      BTW, here’s more info about Thomas I bet you didn’t know:

      “Thomas frequently spoke on the difference between socialism and Communism, explaining the differences between the movement he represented and that of revolutionary Marxism. His early admiration for the Russian Revolution subsequently turned into devout anti-Communism. (The revolutionaries thought him no better; Leon Trotsky, on more than one occasion, levelled high-profile criticism at Thomas.)”

      You: “OMG, you mean there’s a difference between socialism and Communism?”

      Me: “Yes, madjewess, there is. Please, stop being an ignorant hillbilly dumb ass.”

      August 21, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    • “More: One CANNOT be ‘fascistic’ when not in power. Independents and conservatives are NOT IN POWER, in order to be a ‘fascist’ one must have a LEADER with a PARTY.”

      BTW, this statement, like many others you’ve made, is utter bullshit. You’re telling me that a fascist philosophy ceases to be fascist when the fascist is removed from office? I suppose the second Mussolini was removed from power he turned into a tree-hugging hippie.

      For fuck sake, please read a book.

      August 21, 2009 at 10:46 pm

  10. You get pretty foul.
    Please inform me of WHAT in the communist goals are of a CHRISTIAN perspective?

    ’22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. <This?

    -25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. <This?

    '26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy." <This?

    '27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch." <This?

    28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."<This?

    29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
    30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
    (Yes, these are all "Christian" fundamentals….okkk)

    These were entered into record for a PURPOSE, so that it would be AVOIDED. It was not avoided, it is now AMERICA, thanks to the SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT party.
    Well, Nikita Kruschev said:
    "America will go down without a single shot being fired"

    Nikita wa right. Thanks Obama, Thanks Clinton, Thanks 43 and 41.

    August 21, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    • I give up. Arguing with you is like arguing with a lima bean. I just demonstrated how patently false and ignorant your sources were – and you continue to use the same source, as if it’s still factually correct! Those so-called “Communist Goals” were entered into the public record so certain assholes could score political points…kinda how Tom Ridge used the terror alerts to boost Bush’s political advantage. Don’t believe me? Read the Washington Post today. I even put it on my Twitter!

      But you didn’t know any of this and more, because you don’t read. You’re the reason Bill Maher thinks America is stupid…and the reason he may be right.

      August 21, 2009 at 11:08 pm

  11. BTW, sugar… I am a NATIVE NYer 😉

    August 21, 2009 at 10:59 pm

    • Then as a Native NYer you probably have access to information that less fortunate people don’t have. You have no excuse for being so fucking ignorant.

      August 21, 2009 at 11:09 pm

  12. Ed…WHY are you so angry? Such intolerent speech ‘f*cking’

    It PLAINLY says on that link, (that was a pamphlet) from 1963 when and what date it was entered and by whom.

    Bill Maher… ok, as you judged me, told me that I parrot Rush, who I cant stand, and told me I parrot the Repubs, who I am not affiliated with.

    Is there ANY WAY you can debate without defaming with little childlike comments?

    August 21, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    • You’re right…it PLAINLY SAYS on that link everything you need to know to do a bit of research and figure out it was written by an American conservative shortly after the McCarthy Era. Despite that, however, you continue to believe it was written by a Communist and that it describes Communist agenda – and according to you, by extension this describes the progressive agenda and even our support for gay rights. Your blog is full of regressive anti-feminism, thinly veiled racism, and other lunatic right-wing rantings. You follow Michael Savage on Twitter. Yeah, you can’t stand Rush Limbaugh, but Michael Savage is OK in your book. Is Rush simply not enough of a right-wing, pompous windbag for you?

      I’m not really angry as much as I am frustrated by my inability to persuade you with facts. I’m more frustrated by the fact that I dedicated an entire post to people like you entitled “The Conservative Church” that was specifically about the futility of arguing with illogical right-wingers who are fact-deprived and bat-shit insane – and I still argued with you in the off chance that you were a bright individual underneath all that lunacy. I should have known better then; now I do. It becomes boring to refute your every argument with a well-placed factoid, and when you insist on going in a circle-jerk with the same refuted arguments, it’s just plain maddening.

      In short, no, there is no way to debate you without defaming you with little child-like comments, because your mentality really is little and child-like. You have not evolved a capacity for thinking rationally. Even if you have, you’d still be coming from a fundamentally different place, a place that believes in Social Darwinism and everybody for themselves. I could never see eye to eye with that. Given your ideology, arguing with you is truly futile even if you were a critical thinker…although perhaps if you were, you might not be a right-winger. Oh well.

      August 21, 2009 at 11:35 pm

  13. No, this was not ‘written’ by a Christian OR a ‘conservative’
    It was written in RUSSIAN by a SOVIET, they taught us this crap for YEARS in History class in the early 80’s. They had a pamphlet in Russaian and one in English. Of course they would say it is ‘conservative’ but I ask AGAIN, WHAT in that pamphlet is ‘pro-Conservative?’ McCarthy? I never brought it up, and he has ZERO to do with a SOVIET pamhlet.
    I have to say though, that ALL of these ‘goals’ are our lives, so WHO-EVER thought about it, OR WHOEVER wrote it is not the point as much as it is OUR LIFE NOW, and its NOT supposed to be.

    Savage is a DOLT now. Only talks about his DOG.

    You also call me ‘bat-shit’ insane, yet I am not the one with all of the insults now, am I?

    August 21, 2009 at 11:55 pm

    • 1) Google the name Cleon Skousen. Do your homework before fonting in my direction again. In your case, that means a lot of homework. We’re talking grade school type shit.

      2) Do you always make a habit of following right-wing, virulently racist and homophobic “dolts” on Twitter?

      3) From your page:
      “To incog and the fags: F*CK OFF and DIE (except Orion14, my half bro.)”

      So, you’re not the one with the insults. What is it they say about crack-heads who live in glass crack-houses? Oh yeah, crack-heads who live in glass crack-houses should not throw crack rocks.

      August 22, 2009 at 12:00 am

  14. Well, incog wants to KILL ME!! He is a rabid anti-semite!! For NO reason, against me!! I can see if he wants to get the Jews in power out, thats one thing, but he wants to KILL US ALL!

    Anyway, I am tired now, but I looked at your art, I LIKE it.

    I only follow one person on twitter, b/c I am not tech-saavy, I cant figure out how to get people to follow me, nor do I really care if they do, my stats are high, b/c I am a contraversial character.

    Anyway, since your an artist, I am sure there MUST be some God in you?

    August 22, 2009 at 12:31 am

    • I am more a deist with major doubts as to the accuracy of the Bible to really tell us anything about God. Human beings wrote the Bible as far as I’m concerned, and it shows.

      August 23, 2009 at 8:56 am

  15. He authored a pamphlet titled The Communist Attack on the John Birch Society, observing that those who criticized Birch Society members tended to promote Communism.[7]

    This is NOT factual, it is also WIKIpedia, Wikipedia is not factual.
    the communist goals, were originally written by a Soviet, so that we would recognize the danger.
    as far as McCarthy?
    In many ways he was right.

    August 22, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    • You’re right. How stupid of me to use Wikipedia as a source. Maybe I should consult Skousen’s official web site,

      Hmm…well, lookie here….

      “W. Cleon Skousen (1913-2006) was a popular teacher, lecturer and author in the United States for over 40 years. Born in Raymond, Alberta, Canada on January 20, 1913, Dr. Skousen’s growing up years were spent in Canada, Mexico, and California.

      At age 17 he was called to serve a two-year, LDS mission to Great Britain for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. He later attended college at the San Bernardino Junior College where he was elected Student Body President.”

      Now let’s see what those mixed-up rat bastards at Wikipedia pulled out of their asses:

      “Skousen was born to a Mormon family in Raymond, Alberta, Canada, and moved with his family to both Mexico and then back to California as a youth. At the age of 17 he accepted a religious assignment in Great Britain as a missionary for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS).”

      So, Wikipedia and the official Cleon Skousen site have almost identical biographies. Wow, Wikipedia was…actually right. They were RIGHT! I’m shocked!

      And, once again, a conservative does not do her homework and gets the facts wrong. That part doesn’t shock me though.

      August 23, 2009 at 9:01 am

  16. Karl Marx was the originator. I studied this in school, if you would like, I can fax you the papers. Not everything online in WIKI is truth, although you all belive this.
    “The Naked Communist” is NOT the Communist Manifesto.

    August 22, 2009 at 2:27 pm

  17. ‘We’re talking grade school type shit.’

    Also, Ed, come on…stop being so nasty. I have EVERY right to DEFEND myself against the incogsnob.
    You have not said that “All Jews should be killed” So, WHY would I post to you the same way as I HAVE to with the incogsnob?

    August 22, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    • I don’t even know why I’m bothering to explain this to you…

      When incogsnob says something anti-Semitic, you have every right to call him a fag, although why you’d choose to respond to bigotry with bigotry is beyond me. But when you say racist, anti-woman, anti-Muslim, homophobic, and other bigoted things in your blog, I get to call you a redneck fucktard. See how it works?

      August 23, 2009 at 9:09 am

  18. Oh, also, following the Bible does not make me a ‘homophobe’ I have many friends that are ‘gay’ they know my stance, I still love them anyway. But I believe what they do is wrong, and I will stick with that.
    Are you a NORMALPHOBE?

    August 22, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    • I get what you’re saying. I love Chris Rock, and one of my favorite routines is one in which he explains the difference between a gay guy and a fag. Living in San Francisco seems to give me some free reign with the “f” word around people I know and love. As a result, I call my homies fags all the time.

      Only difference is, I don’t think homosexuals are going to burn in hell for all eternity because of something they can’t even choose. You can’t love someone for who they are, then turn around and say, “by the way, you’re going to perish in flames”.

      August 23, 2009 at 9:15 am

  19. I dont talk much about muslims.
    I am against femi-nazis, they are terrible beastly women, and ygly to boot, I should know, I WAS ONE, when I repented of my EVIL ways, I became pretty 🙂

    I disagree with you on homosexuals, but I have a lot of homosexual friends that are log-cabin repubs. They know I dont like it, but I cant FORCE people to ‘change’ right?

    I dont really say ‘fag’ too much. I dont say the “N” word, I grew up where it was not tolerated, as I stated. But I am tired of white people now going through a bunch of BS being called things they aren’t anymore, just b/c they dont like the pres.

    We dont like his POLICIES, not his ‘color’ and nobody wants to be called ‘kkk’ when they have zero to do with any neo-nazi or kkk group. Most conservatives like Keyes, and they liked Powell, and Rice, so, I dont know where people get the ‘racist’ junk from, the republicans are the ones that put black people in powerful positions before the democrats. Thats a fact, so all of this “YOU ARE A RACIST” really can drag a person down.

    August 23, 2009 at 3:39 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s